ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Occupational noise in the university setting: dosimetric assessment and strategies for exposure reduction.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Credit-frequency compliance paradox and dual-track hazard evolution in urban occupational health.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates occupational noise exposure in a university setting through dosimetric assessments conducted at Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI), Ecuador, by analyzing measurements collected in distinct campus areas during two periods, 2017 and 2025. Methods: Sound pressure levels were measured across selected high-traffic and functional campus areas using standardized equipment in accordance with UNE-EN-ISO 9612:2009. Results: Measurements revealed an increasing trend in occupational noise exposure across university areas, with 2025 levels substantially exceeding recommended thresholds. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the critical need for implementing targeted noise mitigation strategies to protect auditory health and preserve academic excellence within higher education institutions. Implications: Adopting these strategies can significantly reduce occupational health risks and foster a healthier, more effective academic environment. The study proposes comprehensive mitigation strategies tailored to university environments to address these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.