ReviewCureus2025
Successful Interventions to Improve Pediatric Vaccine Uptake in Hesitant Cohorts: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey at 15: A summary of its use, reach, and scope.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is a multi-faceted topic that encompasses many different etiologies and solutions. There remains limited literature regarding effective interventions to target these hesitant cohorts. The objective of our paper was to review existing publications that quantitatively measure if tested interventions resulted in an increase in pediatric vaccine uptake within populations that have been evaluated for vaccine hesitancy. Articles were obtained by performing a database search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, as well as through hand-searching. Eligible studies included those published in or after 2013, conducted in the United States on pediatric participants eighteen years or younger, and measured quantitatively the success of an intervention. Eight reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for inclusion. Rayyan facilitated an organized screening process. Data was hand-extracted and collated into charts to identify trends from the seven final articles. Seven articles describing successful interventions that addressed parental vaccine hesitancy and increased pediatric vaccination rates were analyzed. The most prevalent theme among the interventions was healthcare provider communication (71%), followed by parent education (57%), multi-level interventions (57%), standardization of the vaccination process (43%), and healthcare provider education (23%). There were limitations to this scoping review. While vaccine hesitancy was surveyed pre-intervention in each study, those individuals identified as hesitant were not isolated for the target intervention, apart from one article. Additionally, there were different study outcome measures, which made the statistics not directly comparable. Nonetheless, this scoping review identified recurrent evidence-based themes to increase vaccine uptake in hesitant pediatric populations. These interventions should be implemented in medical education and clinical practices to improve pediatric vaccine coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.