ArticleCureus2025
Beyond Traditional Simulation: An Exploratory Study on the Effectiveness and Acceptability of ChatGPT‑4o Advanced Voice Mode for Communication Skills Practice Among Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Social Media Interaction in Developing Intercultural Digital Communication Competence: A Systematic Literature Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Use of Digital Technology for Developing Communication Skills in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Review
- Scaling Multimodal Agentic AI in Medical Education: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study of Simulation Effectiveness in Primary Care.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education clinical skills curricula: a scoping review of implementations since 2022.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Healthcare Professionals Describe Difficulties Encountered When Breaking Bad News to Oncology Patients: An Italian Observational Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Pharm D student's Knowledge, perception, and practice of CHAT-GPT in clinical training: a web-based cross-sectional survey in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of AI Communication Training Tools in Medical Undergraduate Education: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study Within a Primary Care Context.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Effective communication skills are essential for quality medical practice and patient care, yet providing sufficient practice opportunities remains challenging in medical education. Traditional approaches using standardized patients (SPs) face limitations, including high costs and logistical constraints. This study investigates the potential of conversational artificial intelligence (AI) to supplement communication skills practice among medical students. Methodology We conducted a mixed-methods study employing a convergent parallel design with 27 medical students from three UK universities between November 2024 and March 2025. Participants engaged in communication skills roleplay sessions using freely available ChatGPT as an SP. Pre- and post-session assessments measured perceived usefulness and self-reported confidence in three communication domains: dealing with challenging patients, breaking bad news, and counselling anxious patients. The instrument was adapted from the Immersive Technology Evaluation Measure (ITEM). Quantitative data were analyzed using non-parametric tests and ordinal logistic regression, while qualitative responses underwent reflexive thematic analysis. Results Self-reported confidence increased significantly across all communication domains following the ChatGPT simulation. Confidence in dealing with challenging patients increased from a median of 3 to 4 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.