ArticleCureus2025
Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Implementation in Major Gynecologic Procedures: A Prospective Case-Control Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between General Comfort and Postoperative Recovery in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- Association between nursing execution and postoperative recovery following laparoscopic benign gynecologic surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Application and research progress of the rapid rehabilitation concept in the perioperative gynaecological period.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have shown promise in improving patient outcomes across various surgical specialties. However, their adoption in gynecologic surgery has been relatively slow. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an ERAS protocol specifically tailored for major gynecologic procedures. Methods Following the Ethical Committee's approval and patient consent, a prospective case-control study was conducted over 18 months. The study included 180 women undergoing major gynecologic surgery, divided into Pre-ERAS (n=90) and ERAS (n=90) groups. The ERAS protocol incorporated preoperative education, carbohydrate loading, minimal bowel preparation, standardized anesthesia and fluid management, early mobilization, early feeding, and multimodal pain management, while Pre-ERAS patients received conventional treatment as per institutional protocol. Results ERAS patients experienced a faster return of bowel function, with eight patients (8.9%) having the first bowel sounds within four hours. All ERAS patients ambulated within 24 hours, compared to 52 patients (57.8%) in the Pre-ERAS group. Pain management was superior in the ERAS group, with 70 patients (77.8%) reporting a pain score of 3 on day three, versus 24 patients (26.7%) in the Pre-ERAS group. Postoperative complications were significantly reduced in the ERAS group (n=12; 13.3% vs n=28; 31.1%). Notably, 73 ERAS patients (81.1%) were discharged within seven days, compared to 35 patients (38.9%) in the Pre-ERAS group. Conclusion The study demonstrates that implementing an ERAS protocol in major gynecologic surgery leads to faster recovery, reduced postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.