ArticleCureus2025
Lumbar Spinous Process Impaction Injuries Caused by Extension Stress in Adolescent Athletes: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumbar spinous process injuries in adolescent athletes are rare and primarily attributed to traction mechanisms during flexion stress. Here, we present two cases of spinous process contusion and fracture, believed to result from impaction of adjacent spinous processes during lumbar extension. Case 1 involved a 14-year-old male volleyball player who presented with localized tenderness between the L4 and L5 spinous processes and extension-induced lower back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed high signal intensity at the caudal aspect of the L4 spinous process on short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences; however, computed tomography (CT) revealed no evidence of fracture. Symptoms fully resolved after three months of lumbar orthosis use combined with cessation of sports activities, as confirmed by follow-up clinical and imaging assessments. Case 2 involved an 11-year-old male basketball player who experienced acute lower back pain immediately after a hyperextension injury sustained during lifting in a hyperextended posture. MRI demonstrated high signal intensity at the cranial L4 spinous process on STIR sequences, and CT revealed a fracture line. Continued play with extension restriction using a lumbar orthosis resulted in bony union within three months. These cases highlight a novel mechanism involving impaction during lumbar extension for lumbar spinous process injury in adolescent athletes. Early recognition and conservative management focusing on extension restriction are key to achieving favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.