ArticleCureus2025
Early Return to Play Following Conservative Treatment of a Lumbar Flexion-Distraction Injury in a Professional Soccer Player: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flexion-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine, often classified as AO type B2, are typically considered unstable and are generally managed surgically. However, the optimal approach for managing such injuries in elite athletes remains unclear, particularly considering the potential career-limiting consequences of spinal fusion. We report the case of a 32-year-old professional soccer player who sustained a flexion-distraction injury at the T12-L1 level during a match. Imaging confirmed an L1 compression fracture with posterior ligament complex disruption. Despite surgical indications, the athlete exhibited excellent core stability, no neurological deficits, and preserved alignment. A multidisciplinary team opted for conservative treatment, including rigid bracing and staged rehabilitation. The athlete resumed non-contact training at week seven, returned to full-contact practice at week 10, and competed in official matches by week 12. At the two-year follow-up, he remained symptom-free, with no spinal deformity or recurrence. This case suggests that in elite athletes with preserved spinal stability and core strength, conservative management of flexion-distraction injuries may allow for a timely return to play while avoiding the long-term drawbacks of fusion surgery. Individualized decision-making and close follow-ups are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.