Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535368›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A 50-Year Delay in the Diagnosis of Takayasu Arteritis: Clinical Presentation and Therapeutic Insights.

Takuya Yasuda, Noboru Hagino

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takuya YasudaDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Nakadori General Hospital, Akita, JPN.
Noboru HaginoDivision of Rheumatology, Teikyo University Medical Center in Chiba, Ichihara, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare inflammatory disease that affects large blood vessels, primarily targeting the aorta and its major branches. However, its etiology remains unknown. Although TAK is reported worldwide, it has a higher prevalence among women of Asian descent. Here, we report a rare case of TAK diagnosed 50 years after the onset of initial symptoms in a 76-year-old Japanese woman. The patient initially experienced numbness in her left upper extremities, followed by loss of consciousness. She had occasionally experienced difficulties with blood pressure measurements during routine medical examinations since the age of 20 years. Several months before admission, she had experienced visual darkening during physical activity and orthostatic dizziness that resolved with recumbency. Laboratory test results, including complete blood count, liver and renal function, C-reactive protein levels, and electrolyte levels, were within the normal limits. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed stenosis of the bilateral subclavian arteries and the left common and internal carotid arteries, along with prominent collateral circulation, suggesting TAK. Given the substantial risk associated with corticosteroid-based therapy, we initiated treatment with aspirin and atorvastatin. After discharge, infliximab was started at 200 mg for three doses and then increased to a dose of 300 mg (5 mg/kg) every six weeks. Orthostatic symptoms markedly improved after the sixth infusion. Dizziness did not worsen during follow-up. Annual follow-up CTA and carotid ultrasonography showed no arterial stenosis progression.  This case report reveals that despite normal inflammatory marker levels, vascular stenosis of the carotid and subclavian arteries may cause dizziness that can be improved with infliximab therapy. Cases of TAK with marked progression despite normal inflammatory marker levels have been reported. Although the reversibility of vascular stenosis remains uncertain, infliximab therapy considerably improved dizziness and orthostatic symptoms. In patients with unexplained dizziness and orthostatic symptoms, large-vessel vasculitis, such as TAK, should be considered in the differential diagnosis, even in the absence of elevated inflammatory markers.

Indexed as

computed tomography angiographydelayed diagnosisinfliximablatencytakayasu arteritis

Identifiers

PMID40535368
PMCPMC12174477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.