ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Enhancing mu-ERD through combined robotic assistance and motor imagery: a novel approach for upper limb rehabilitation.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous research has suggested that mu-event-related desynchronization (mu-ERD) reflects neural activity associated with motor observation and execution, primarily within the sensorimotor cortex. This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining robotic full-assist therapy with motor imagery on mu-ERD in healthy adults for potential application in stroke patients with severe upper limb paralysis. Methods: Fifteen healthy adults were included in this study. Each participant performed three conditions using the ReoGo-J® robotic system: voluntary movement, full-assist robotic therapy without motor imagery, and full-assist robotic therapy with motor imagery. Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to measure mu-ERD, focusing on the 8-10 Hz and 10-13 Hz frequency bands at the C3, C4, Cz, and Pz electrodes. Results: Significant differences in mu-ERD occurrence were observed at C3 (8-10 Hz) and C4 (10-13 Hz) between the conditions. The combination of motor imagery and robotic therapy demonstrated a higher frequency of mu-ERD occurrence than the other conditions, with moderate effect sizes. However, no significant differences in mu-ERD attenuation rates were found between the conditions. This suggests variability in individual responses. Discussion: These findings highlight the potential of robotic full-assist therapy combined with motor imagery to stimulate neural mechanisms associated with motor recovery. Future studies should include a larger sample size and patients with stroke to validate these findings and explore their clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.