ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Surgically implanted temporary ventricular assist pump - "Impella 5.5".
Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impella 5.5 Support in Severe Cardiogenic Shock: Outcomes From the First Spanish Multicentre Cohort in Heart Transplant Centres.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is an advanced left ventricular assist device that provides short-term cardiac support for patients with severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Its compact size and catheter-based design facilitate relatively straightforward insertion, offering mechanical support to the left ventricle without significantly increasing afterload-two key advantages. A substantial body of clinical trials and real-world evidence have confirmed its efficacy in enhancing cardiac output and organ perfusion. Notably, its short-term support has been associated with improved patient outcomes in cases of cardiogenic shock. However, the use of Impella is not without risks, including bleeding events, peripheral vascular complications, and hemolysis, underscoring the importance of appropriate patient selection, surgical planning, and meticulous post-insertion management. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and continued advancements in technology. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the Impella device, including its design, clinical applications, surgical strategies, benefits, and indications, as well as the challenges associated with its use. It reassesses its role considering the most recent evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.