Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535183›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Spanish Validation of the

Danilo Dominguez, Carles Pérez-Testor, Paula Benedico-Peydró, Aina Casarramona, Berta Aznar-Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danilo DominguezFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Carles Pérez-TestorFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Paula Benedico-PeydróFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Aina CasarramonaFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Berta Aznar-MartínezFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is a gap in the available Spanish-language instruments that specifically measure the behaviors or tactics used by parents in conflict or hostile situations with their children. The main objective of this study was to translate, adapt, and validate the Conflict Tactics Scale: Parent to Child (CTSPC) within the Spanish context, evaluating its psychometric properties, including exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency. Method: A sample of 700 parents (350 women and 350 men) aged between 18 and 69 years was used. Results: The Spanish version of the CTSPC consists of 21 items distributed across 3 dimensions: Non-Violent Discipline ( Discussion: This instrument emerges as a valuable tool for identifying inappropriate tactics and behaviors employed by parents toward their children, contributing to the prevention of child maltreatment and raising parental awareness about how to educate children without resorting to violence.

Indexed as

child maltreatmentcoercive disciplinecorporal punishmentnon-violent disciplinephysical aggressionphysical maltreatmentpsychological aggression

Identifiers

PMID40535183
PMCPMC12175065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.