Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535165›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T water2025

Household Point-of-Use Faucet Filters for Lead Removal: Field Performance and User Experiences.

Jeannie M Purchase, Chantaly Villalona, Adrienne Katner, Kelsey Pieper, Marc Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T water, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeannie M PurchaseVirginia Tech, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.
Chantaly VillalonaVirginia Tech, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.
Adrienne KatnerLouisiana State University Health Science Center, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States.
Kelsey PieperNortheastern University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-6527
Marc EdwardsVirginia Tech, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1889-1193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lead certified point of use (POU) faucet filters were field tested in two Louisiana cities in a total of 21 occupied homes during normal use and in two unoccupied homes with very high risk of water lead (Pb) contamination. In an unoccupied home with a 28 m lead service line (LSL) with average lead of 17 μg/L in flushed water, treatment by POU filters generally produced water with <5 μg/L Pb even when tested to 200% of rated capacity. In the unoccupied home with a disturbed LSL, the water had erratic influent particulate lead of 9-3053 μg/L, and the POUs did not consistently produce water with <10 μg/L Pb despite very high percentage removals. When testing POUs in occupied homes known to occasionally have lead over 5 μg/L, POUs always reduced lead to <1 μg/L. In addition, POUs were also effectively removing high levels of iron and manganese present in the water of one city, but this also caused clogging before reaching half of their rated capacity. Laboratory experiments confirmed POU susceptibility to iron clogging.

Indexed as

consumer experienceiron cloggingparticulate leadpoint of use lead filters

Identifiers

PMID40535165
PMCPMC12172044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.