Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535162›Full record

ReviewACS ES&T water2025

When the Household is the Utility: Ensuring Equitable Water Service for Rural US Communities Served by Decentralized Water Systems.

Claire Cropper, Elizabeth Wulbrecht, Patrick Thomson, Aaron D Dotson, Kerry A Hamilton, Amber Wutich, Paul Westerhoff, Lee E Voth-Gaddert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS ES&T water, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire CropperSchool of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, 781 S Terrace Rd, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States.
Elizabeth WulbrechtAlaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 4000 Ambassador Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508, United States.
Patrick ThomsonSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, U.K.
Aaron D DotsonDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Alaska Anchorage, Eng. and Industry Building Suite 301, 2900 Spirit Dr., Anchorage, Alaska 99508, United States.
Kerry A HamiltonSchool of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, 727 E. Tyler Street, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-7325
Amber WutichCenter for Global Health, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, 900 S. Cady Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85284, United States.
Paul WesterhoffSchool of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, 781 S Terrace Rd, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-8759
Lee E Voth-GaddertBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, 727 E. Tyler Street, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-1958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite nationally reported metrics that suggest high levels of water security, approximately 12% of the United States of America (US) population is estimated to be water insecure based on the definition in United Nations (UN) SDG 6.1.1. Approximately half of these households are served by Decentralized Water Systems (DWS). In contrast, most research, engineering, innovation, and government programs are focused on Centralized Water Systems (CWS). In this perspective, we 1) characterize and define DWS using professional language common for CWS; 2) compare the social, economic, and regulatory responsibilities of stakeholders in each system; 3) outline existing strategies to professionalize this sector; and 4) propose research avenues to further professionalize DWS to ensure households served by these systems receive equitable water service. We demonstrate that while DWS share commonalities with CWS, decentralized systems are less formally structured; have more stakeholders between source and tap; and place much of the regulatory, finance, maintenance, and safety responsibilities on individual households. These responsibilities include ensuring water quantity and quality, selecting appropriate treatment technologies, finance of repairs and upgrades, and transporting water. We propose strategies for researchers to aid in codeveloping innovative DWS solutions, ensuring relevant integration and community-driven models that better support decentralized communities.

Indexed as

decentralizehaulMAD (modular, adaptive, decentralized)water

Identifiers

PMID40535162
PMCPMC12172056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.