SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in quadricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a quadricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is now a standard treatment for severe aortic stenosis, its use in patients with quadricuspid aortic valves (QAV) presents unique challenges. This review analyzes current evidence to guide clinicians in managing aortic stenosis in this complex valve morphology. Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases up to August 15, 2024. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, focusing on 30-day mortality and procedural success, with secondary outcomes including paravalvular leak incidence, pacemaker insertion, hemodynamic changes, and NYHA functional class improvement. Results: A total of 11 case reports/series were analyzed, involving 17 adult patients with QAV. Participants had a mean age of 73.80 ± 5.07 years. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 41.6%, and the mean annulus area was 595.5 mm Conclusion: TAVR is an effective and growing treatment for high-risk patients with aortic valve disease, including those with QAV. While it has high success rates and challenges (i.e., post-operatively). Future studies should focus on long-term valve durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.