ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in young multimorbid patients as compared to an age-, gender- and comorbidity-matched background population.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 65 Years and Younger: Unresolved Issues and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Young Patients: Challenges and Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Contrary to the current guidelines patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and ≤65 years of age are often referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the outcome after TAVR in this patient cohort remains unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the rationale for denial of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in young multimorbid patients referred for TAVR, to evaluate 3-year all-cause mortality and to compare outcomes with a matched control cohort. Patients and methods: Retrospective data were collected on all consecutive patients ≤65 years of age with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVR at 9 centres between 2010 and 2019. The TAVR-population was compared with a 1:4 age-, gender-, and comorbidity-matched population obtained from the Danish National Registries. Results: The study population consisted of 459 TAVR-recipients and 1,836 matched registry-controls. The main reasons for SAVR denial were prior cardiac surgery (35%), lung disease (30%) and frailty (23%). The 3-year all-cause mortality was 34% in the TAVR-group compared with 8% in the age-, gender- and comorbidity-matched controls with a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.5 (95% CI 4.5-9.6; Conclusions: Young, multimorbid aortic stenosis patients aged ≤65 years and treated with TAVR between 2010 and 2019 have increased medium-term all-cause mortality compared with an age-, gender- and comorbidity-matched background population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.