ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Risk, risk factors, and screening of malignancies in dermatomyositis: current status and future perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Different age, different phenotype: a comparative analysis of juvenile and adult-onset dermatomyositis from a tertiary centre.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Periorbital heliotrope erythema with edema as a potential clinical marker of paraneoplastic Dermatomyositis - a case series.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Review
- Unmasking peripheral T-cell lymphoma in dermatomyositis with anti-PM/Scl-100 and anti-Mi-2 positivity: a case-based review.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Article
- Hyperglycemia-A Driver of Cutaneous Severity in Dermatomyositis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Dermatomyositis: Prevalence, Clinical Spectrum, Diagnostic Approach, and Management Strategies.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Case Report: breast cancer presenting as dermatomyositis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Atypical Interplay of Dermatomyositis, Metastatic Caecal Carcinoma, and Connective Tissue Disease.Cureus · 2026Article
- Cancer Risk in Autoimmune and Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Narrative Review for Practising Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy with characteristic cutaneous inflammation and heterogeneous systemic involvements, and is strongly associated with risk of malignancy. This review summarizes the incidence of malignancies, risk factors associated with malignancies, and cancer screening methods in DM patients. Large population-based cohort studies and meta-analyses have provided strong evidence for the significantly elevated incidence of malignancies in DM patients. Common malignancies occurring in DM patients mainly include ovarian cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, hematologic malignancies, and colorectal cancer. Clinicians should cautiously consider the risk of malignancy in DM patients during diagnosis and treatment, conducting regular screening and monitoring to facilitate early detection and treatment of malignancies. Among myositis-specific antibodies, anti-transcription intermediary factor 1γ antibodies are strongly linked to malignancy risk. Other factors such as older age, male gender, dysphagia, skin necrosis, cutaneous vasculitis, rapid onset of the disease, elevated creatinine kinase, and elevated C-reactive protein are closely associated with the risk of malignancy. DM patients with these features need receive screening for malignant tumors or close monitoring and follow-up. DM patients, especially those within 3 years of onset, have a high risk of cancer and should receive careful cancer screening according to their risk stratification. Conventional screening tools such as imaging examinations and tumor marker tests are not effective in detecting malignancies among DM patients. Current cancer screening workflows available for DM patients largely mirror those used in the general population but may not fully address DM-specific characteristics, and the best strategy for screening cancer in DM patients is still lacking. To facilitate earlier detection and diagnosis of DM-associated cancer and thereby improve outcomes, more effective cancer detection tools and personalized malignancy screening workflows specifically tailored to the features of DM and their individual risk stratification are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.