ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Multimodal data integration with machine learning for predicting PARP inhibitor efficacy and prognosis in ovarian cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progression-free survival outcomes of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: an exploratory analysis of treatment heterogeneity based on organ vulnerability.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of germlineBMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Flavonols as potent inhibitors of tyrosinase & pancreatic lipase: synthesis, docking, MD simulation, DFT, and ADMET.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have brought a significant breakthrough in the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer. However, beyond BRCA mutation/HRD, the direct impact of other prognostic factors on PARPi response and prognosis remains inadequately characterized. Methods: We assessed PARPi prognostic factors from clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and biochemical indicators from 251 ovarian cancer patients. Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify the factors which influencing PARPi efficacy and patients prognosis. Feature screening was conducted using correlation analysis, significance analysis, Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), and Elastic Net stability analysis. Patient-specific efficacy and prognosis prediction models were then constructed using various machine learning algorithms. Results: Total bile acids (TBAs) and CA-199 present as an independent risk factor in Cox multivariate analysis for primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients respectively (P < 0.05). TBAs emerged as a risk factor, with each unit increase associated with a 10% rise in recurrence risk. The best-performing model has an AUC of 0.79 ± 0.09 and an AUC of 0.72 ± 0.03 for primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients respectively. External validation(n=36) in multicenter cohorts maintained robust performance with AUC of 0.74 and an AUC of 0.70 for primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients respectively. Conclusions: We identified TBAs and CA-199 as a significant prognostic factor in primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients respectively. The integration of multimodal data with machine learning holds significant potential for enhancing prognosis prediction in PARPi treatment for ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.