Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535126›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Prospective evaluation of mpMRI-derived nomograms for detecting prostate cancer in PI-RADS v2.1 upgraded and non-upgraded lesions.

Ying Yi, Hang Wang, Dongliang Cheng, Zhifeng Xu, Xianhai Zhang, Chun Luo, Hai Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying YiDepartment of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Hang WangDepartment of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Dongliang ChengDepartment of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Zhifeng XuDepartment of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Xianhai ZhangDepartment of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Chun LuoDepartment of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.
Hai ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist on the performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 upgraded and non-upgraded lesions, both alone and in combined with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) features, for prostate cancer detection. Objective: To evaluate the rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) rates in PI-RADS v2.1 upgraded and non-upgraded lesions, and to identify mpMRI features that improve detection accuracy. Methods: This study included men who underwent mpMRI and ultrasound-guided (US-guided) biopsy from March 2023 to April 2024. MRI scans were prospectively evaluated according to PI-RADS v2.1. MpMRI features were extracted from lesion contours, including three-dimensional maximum diameter, lesion volume, sphericity, surface-to-volume ratio (SVR), T Results: A total of 94 patients(mean age, 65.7 years) with 234 lesions were included. Significant differences were observed between upgraded and non-upgraded PI-RADS 4 lesions( Conclusion: PI-RADS v2.1 upgrading rules improve cancer detection in the TZ, but upgrading PI-RADS category 3 lesions in the PZ may lead to unnecessary biopsies. MpMRI-based nomograms enhance predictive accuracy for both PCa and csPCa.

Indexed as

multiparametric magnetic resonance imagingnomogramPI-RADS v2.1predictive modelprostate cancersynthetic MRI

Identifiers

PMID40535126
PMCPMC12173890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.