ArticleBioMedInformatics2024
Towards the Generation of Medical Imaging Classifiers Robust to Common Perturbations.
Article in BioMedInformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)-based classifiers can be used to diagnose diseases from medical imaging data. However, few of the classifiers proposed in the literature translate to clinical use because of robustness concerns. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study investigates how to improve the robustness of AI/ML imaging classifiers by simultaneously applying perturbations of common effects (Gaussian noise, contrast, blur, rotation, and tilt) to different amounts of training and test images. Furthermore, a comparison with classifiers trained with adversarial noise is also presented. This procedure is illustrated using two publicly available datasets, the PneumoniaMNIST dataset and the Breast Ultrasound Images dataset (BUSI dataset).
resultsClassifiers trained with small amounts of perturbed training images showed similar performance on unperturbed test images compared to the classifier trained with no perturbations. Additionally, classifiers trained with perturbed data performed significantly better on test data both perturbed by a single perturbation (
conclusionsClassifiers trained with perturbed data were found to be more robust to perturbed test data than the unperturbed classifier without exhibiting a performance decrease on unperturbed test images, indicating benefits to training with data that include some perturbed images and no significant downsides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.