Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535086›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Impact of omitting clinical target volume in radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Liang Liu, Wen Bao, Xiaoshuai Yuan, Yaoyao Zhu, Ying Zhang, Petros Christopoulos, Baptiste Abbar, Cheng Qian, Shuangyan Yang, Yaping Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liang Liu *Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Science, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wen Bao *Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Science, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoshuai Yuan *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yaoyao ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Petros ChristopoulosDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and Translational Lung Research Center (member of the German Center for Lung Research, DZL) at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Baptiste AbbarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Paris, France.
Cheng QianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuangyan YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yaping XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Determining the planned target volume (PTV) for locally advanced (LA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often a challenging task for radiation oncologists. Due to advances in effective multidisciplinary treatments, the necessity to reconcile the clinical target volume (CTV) with the gross tumor volume (GTV) and the PTV presents an ongoing controversy. This study sought to analyze the effects of omitting the CTV on the clinical outcomes of patients with LA-NSCLC. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from all consecutive patients with histologically confirmed LA-NSCLC treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups based on different radiotherapy planning techniques: (I) the planning target volume-gross target (PTV-G) group; and (II) the planning target volume-clinical target (PTV-C) group. The PTV-G was directly based on the GTV, while the PTV-C was based on the simulated CTV. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to enhance the comparability of the clinical data between the two groups. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of radiotherapy-associated adverse events. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), post-treatment tumor recurrence patterns, and variations in peripheral blood cell characteristics pre- and post-radiotherapy. Results: A total of 255 patients were identified from our local database. After matching on propensity score with a 1:2 ratio, 156 patients were included in the final analysis, with 52 in the PTV-G group and 104 in the PTV-C group. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 radiation pneumonitis (RP) was significantly higher in the PTV-C group than in the PTV-G group (12.5% Conclusions: Omitting the CTV was associated with a decrease of grade ≥3 radiation-induced toxicities without pejorative impact on PFS or OS in LA-NSCLC patients treated with IMRT. Furthermore, no increase in regional or metastatic recurrence rates were observed. This radiotherapy strategy may be a viable option for selected LA-NSCLC patients, reducing toxicities without compromising outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical target volume (CTV)Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)propensity score matching (PSM)radiation damage

Identifiers

PMID40535086
PMCPMC12170249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.