ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Clinicopathological factors
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utilizing clinical features, genetic mutations, and a 14-gene molecular assay for optimizing the management of multiple primary lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) show promising outcomes in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations, but accurately identifying patients who would derive the greatest benefit remains a clinical challenge. We compared the predictive performance of clinicopathological factors and the 14-gene assay to assess postoperative prognosis and predict the potential benefit of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs in stage I NSCLC. Methods: From March 2013 to February 2019, patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC [8th edition tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification staging] and EGFR mutation were included. The 14-gene assay, assessed through quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), was developed and subsequently validated across diverse international cohorts. Clinicopathological high-risk factors included any feature indicating a higher risk of recurrence based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. The primary endpoint of this study was the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate. Results: Diagnostic values were evaluated in 180 stage I NSCLC patients. The 14-gene assay demonstrated superior performance compared to clinicopathological factors in predicting recurrence events. Patients with molecular high-risk, rather than clinicopathological high-risk factors, showed a more favorable response to adjuvant EGFR-TKIs. Specifically, adjuvant EGFR-TKIs benefited molecular high-risk patients, regardless of clinicopathological high-risk (DFS rate increased from 65.9% to 95.0%, P=0.02) or low-risk subgroups (80.0% to 100%, P=0.04). Patients with molecular low risk did not show any benefit from EGFR-TKIs, regardless of clinicopathological high-risk (DFS rate increased from 93.3% to 100%, P=0.37) or low-risk subgroups (97.0% to 100%, P=0.73). Conclusions: The 14-gene assay is proven to be superior to clinicopathological factors, offering valuable guidance for adjuvant EGFR-TKIs decisions in stage I NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.