ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Neoadjuvant tepotinib in stage IIB N0 non-small cell lung carcinoma with
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate world-wide, but treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including immune check point inhibitors and targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors have greatly improved survival. Many of the targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors have already been approved in the first line in metastatic disease. The use of combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy treatment in the perioperative setting has been highly successful, but patients with driver alterations were largely left out including patients with mesenchymal epithelial transition exon 14 ( Case Description: We discuss the rationale and clinical course of the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant tepotinib in a case study of an elderly patient with a Conclusions: From the single case report, we found that tepotinib was both safe and effective when used in the neoadjuvant setting with no evidence of recurrence after greater than one year of post-operative follow up. Adjuvant treatment was not as well tolerated and therefore stopped. We conclude with a discussion on the advantages and potential downfalls of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.