ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors for second- or later-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evolution of clinical benefit in cancer trials: comparing pivotal approval data with updated efficacy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- High Efficacy of Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced ALK-Rearranged Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Multidimensional tumor heterogeneity and its role in therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies of ALK-Positive Lung Cancer: A Beginner's Guide for Patients, Their Families and Carers.Thoracic cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Second- or later-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly individualized. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (multi-TKIs) has emerged as a chemotherapy-free option for these patients. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy and safety of the treatment. Methods: We systematically searched four databases for studies evaluating ICIs combined with multi-TKIs in second- or later-line therapy for NSCLC. Data were extracted and study quality was assessed using the Canadian Institute of Health Economics tool for case series. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted for efficacy outcomes. Results: Twenty studies (10 prospective and 10 retrospective) were included from 155 retrieved articles. Nineteen studies were conducted in China, with programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) antibodies and anlotinib as the most frequently used combination. The single-arm meta-analysis showed that the pooled median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.74 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.65-6.84], and the median overall survival was 15.41 months (95% CI: 13.40-17.41). The objective response rate was 26.35% (95% CI: 19.52-33.18%), and the disease control rate was about 80.73% (95% CI: 75.59-85.86%). For patients with EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutations, the mPFS was 3.17 months (95% CI: 2.54-3.79). The most commonly reported severe adverse events across the included studies were hypertension, fatigue, hepatic dysfunction, urinary abnormalities, and hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions: The combination of ICIs and multi-TKIs offers an alternative chemotherapy-free treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC in the second- or later-line setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.