ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Dietary patterns and recurrent pregnancy loss: a comparison of the American Heart Association diet, Mediterranean diet and others.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) presents a major challenge in reproductive medicine, with lifestyle factors, especially dietary patterns, potentially influencing pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to explore the relationship between adherence to preconception dietary patterns and pregnancy outcomes in women with RPL. Methods: The study included 475 women with RPL at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Participants completed a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess adherence to six pre-defined dietary patterns at preconception: the American Heart Association Diet (AHA), Trichopoulou Mediterranean Diet (TMED), Panagiotakos Mediterranean Diet (PMED), Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH). Pregnancy loss, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and other adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) (e.g., preterm birth, low birth weight) were ascertained using medical records. Results: Significant associations were observed between adherence to the AHA diet and reduced risks of pregnancy loss [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.36 (0.17, 0.78), P-trend = 0.043], GDM [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.28 (0.10, 0.75), P-trend = 0.006], HDP [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.12 (0.03, 0.57), P-trend = 0.008], and other adverse pregnancy outcomes [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.04 (0.01, 0.35), P-trend = 0.001]. Similar associations were found for the AHEI, AMED, and TMED diets regarding pregnancy loss, GDM, and HDP, while the PMED and DASH diets showed no significant associations. Additionally, higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and lower energy and fat intake were associated with increased live birth rates. Conclusion: Greater adherence to the AHA diet during the preconception period was linked to lower risks of pregnancy loss, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support the AHA diet for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss, indicating that healthy dietary patterns may improve pregnancy outcomes and highlight the need for further research on their impact on fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.