ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Exclusively Macular Phenotype of Non-Syndromic
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this report was to highlight the clinical phenotype and imaging findings in a patient with an exclusively macular phenotype of non-syndromic Case Presentation: A 47-year-old male with progressive vision loss exhibited symptoms indicative of maculopathy. These included decreased central vision, visual distortions, photophobia, poor depth perception, glare, impaired dark/light adaptation, difficulty reading, depressed multifocal ERG responses, and central ellipsoid dropout on SD-OCT. Evaluation included genetic testing, segregation analysis, and a complete ophthalmic examination, including slit-lamp exam, dilated fundus exam, FAF, SD-OCT, ERG, and Humphrey 24-2 visual fields. A 351 gene retinal dystrophy panel revealed two variants in Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of genetic testing in confirming variant inheritance and describes the clinical phenotype associated with MFSD8 c.291G>C (p.Trp97Cys). The variant contributes to a pathological non-syndromic phenotype when in trans with a pathogenic variant. Given the syndromic variants of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.