ReviewDiscover computing2025
Genomic privacy and security in the era of artificial intelligence and quantum computing.
Review in Discover computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Why Should a Genome Be Protected? Ethical, Legal, and Security Challenges in the Protection of Genomic Data.Biology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and genomic data privacy: Balancing innovation with security.Molecular biology research communications · 2026Article
- Adaptive Evolution-Inspired Algorithm for Intrusion Detection in Bioinformatics Systems.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2026Article
- Lost in .*VCF Translation. From Data Fragmentation to Precision Genomics: Technical, Ethical, and Interpretive Challenges in the Post-Sequencing Era.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancements in sequencing technologies have greatly increased access to genomic data stored in public databases. This has raised significant privacy and security concerns. This review emphasizes the importance of protecting genomic data by analyzing vulnerabilities in current storage and sharing practices. It examines the risks genetic databases face from cyber-attacks and internal breaches, focusing especially on advanced AI-driven threats and quantum computing vulnerabilities. The review explores machine learning methods designed to secure data. It highlights algorithms that prioritize privacy while maintaining data confidentiality, such as differential privacy, federated learning, and synthetic data generation using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Findings demonstrate progress in mitigating common privacy breaches like re-identification and inference attacks. However, persistent vulnerabilities remain, particularly to emerging threats such as model inversion and membership inference attacks. The review advocates an integrated approach combining robust legislative frameworks with advanced technology to address genomic privacy challenges. It calls for intensified research efforts to safeguard genomic information. In particular, there is an urgent need to adopt quantum-resistant cryptographic methods, including lattice-based encryption and blockchain-integrated security frameworks. The paper emphasizes the necessity for genomics researchers to prioritize data privacy and security. This ensures responsible handling of genomic information in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.