ArticleEcology and evolution2025
To Hunt or Patrol? Social Composition and Location Mediate Scent Marking Decisions of a Large Carnivore.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- To Hunt or Patrol? Social Composition and Location Mediate Scent Marking Decisions of a Large Carnivore.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While sociality is known to mediate territorial processes, it is less clear how sociality interacts with environmental features and neighbors' location to influence habitat selection and behavior. Scent marking, a fundamental behavior in maintaining territories, can be utilized by receiving conspecifics to evaluate both encounter risk and competitive ability of the depositing individual or group. African wild dog packs were followed in the field across 2010-2021, where researchers recorded individual behaviors and pack composition, including scent marking behaviors. We combined this historical and unique behavioral dataset with co-occurring GPS collar data to make inferences on territorial behaviors, sociality, and habitat selection across spatial scales. We performed three analyses to determine (1) the relative probability of scent mark placement, (2) the probability of scent marking, and (3) the trade-off strategy between scent marking and hunting, as predicted by habitat, neighbors' territories, and pack social composition. Specifically, we used resource selection function frameworks to determine how and whether conspecifics influenced habitat selection and behavior at multiple orders of selection. We found that conspecifics were influential across all three analyses, and mediated the impact of habitat on scent mark placement and probability. Scent mark placement and probability were both influenced by the social composition of packs, specifically pup presence, pack size, and number of overlapping neighbors, while pack size and pack experience influenced territorial maintenance strategy. Our findings demonstrate the importance of social structure across scales of territorial processes, from larger scale habitat selection to the probability of a behavior. We demonstrate how key behavioral theories underpinning territoriality function at the scale of habitat selection and behavioral decision-making in a free-ranging, large carnivore. Future research should continue to incorporate sociality in understanding the habitat selection of animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.