ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2025
A Case Series of the Use of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Procedural sedation in children has the propensity to result in costly hospital admissions and prolonged lengths of stay in emergency departments due to the coordination and resources required for completion. The use of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine in children for procedural sedation has been growing in popularity and demand in many clinical settings. Dexmedetomidine is a centrally acting alpha-2 agonist with anesthetic and anxiolytic properties, making it a useful option for sedation. Additional benefits of its use in the pediatric emergency department include high tolerability, decreased emotional distress of children, and ease of administration without need for parenteral access. Of the 18 pediatric patients who received IN dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation, 10 patients had successful procedural sedation solely with IN dexmedetomidine use. The success rate with IN dexmedetomidine was 63% for non-painful procedures (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], computed tomography [CT]) and 57% for painful procedures (eye examinations, laboratory draw/intravenous [IV] placement, fracture reduction, foreign body removal). There were no documented adverse events with IN dexmedetomidine. Of the 18 patients, only 1 patient needed to return for a repeated scan and 2 patients were admitted owing to sedation needs. The use of IN dexmedetomidine in the pediatric emergency department provides a safe and less invasive option for sedation than commonly used sedatives. This leads to a reduced need for admissions dedicated to obtaining procedural sedation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.