ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2025
Risk Management of Valproate and Other Teratogenic Anticonvulsants in the Era of Proliferating Use.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Valproic acid, carbamazepine and topiramate have well-known teratogenic risk and all 3 rank among the top 10 teratogenic medications with the highest prenatal exposure risk. Importantly, pregnancies exposed to valproic acid are not dominated by patients with epilepsy but rather with less serious conditions such as migraine. In the United States, only a weight loss combination product containing topiramate has a mandatory pregnancy prevention program, a so-called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), while prevention of fetal exposure to all three single ingredient products relies on information in the product labeling and a medication guide provided at dispensing. REMS have been avoided for antinconvulsants because of concerns about reduced medication access for patients with serious conditions such as epilepsy, hence weighting maternal harm due to uncontrolled disease against adverse pregnancy or infant outcomes. However, the broad and growing spectrum of indications for all three medications, paired with increasingly strict abortion laws that may not allow pregnancy termination if accidental fetal exposure occurs, may require re-assessment of the benefit-risk of REMS. Here we argue that formal quantitative approaches are needed that allow assessments of maternal and infant risk, considering maternal disease, adverse pregnancy outcomes and teratogenic effects on infants, and the overall public health impact of REMS for anticonvulsants. For valproic acid, given its broad use, high risk of fetal exposure, and profound impact on child health, we predict the public health impact of a REMS will be favorable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.