Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534917›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Sign language detection dataset: A resource for AI-based recognition systems.

Bindu Garg, Manisha Kasar, Priyanka Paygude, Amol Dhumane, Srinivas Ambala, Jitendra Rajpurohit, Abhay Sharma, Vidula Meshram, Amber Vats, Achyut Kashyap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bindu GargBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Manisha KasarBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Priyanka PaygudeBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Amol DhumaneSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune, India.
Srinivas AmbalaPimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Jitendra RajpurohitSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune, India.
Abhay SharmaManipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India.
Vidula MeshramVishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, India.
Amber VatsBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Achyut KashyapBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign language is a very important mode of communication among deaf and hard-of-hearing populations. Automatic sign language detection based on deep learning model is the theme of this study. Hand gestures are classified by the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to different signs. For training purposes, there are 26,000 images available with 3000 images for every alphabet letter such that there is complete representation of sign language gesture. Photos were taken in controlled lighting with a consistent black background to facilitate better feature extraction. The data contains varied participants of various age groups, skin types, and hand shapes to enhance generalization. Data collection was standardized through iPhone 15 Pro Max, black background cloth, tripod stand, and remote-controlled Drodcam app to maintain consistency in image quality and framing. For diversity and realism, three participants were involved in data collection, each providing 1000 images per sign, resulting in a rich and diverse dataset. Preprocessing of data methods were used for achieving the best quality of data, such as resizing, conversion to grayscale, normalization, and augmentation. Different techniques of data augmentation like rotation, flipping, scaling, brightness change, and addition of Gaussian noise were used to introduce variations in hand gestures and make the model robust against various environmental conditions. The dataset was then partitioned into 70 % training, 15 % validation, and 15 % test sets for maximizing model performance and ensuring good generalization. The dataset show high accuracy, reflecting the potential of the model for real-world usage, such as accessibility tools for the deaf community, educational tools, and real-time sign language recognition systems.

Indexed as

American Sign LanguageConvolutional Neural NetworkDeep LearningSign Language Recognition

Identifiers

PMID40534917
PMCPMC12173717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.