Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534900›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T air2025

Potential Errors in CMAQ NO:NO

Abiola S Lawal, T Nash Skipper, Cesunica E Ivey, Daniel L Goldberg, Jennifer Kaiser, Armistead G Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T air, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abiola S LawalSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0355, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8542-9898
T Nash SkipperSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0355, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-8736
Cesunica E IveyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 760 Davis Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1710, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-2627
Daniel L GoldbergDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, United States.
Jennifer KaiserSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0355, United States.
Armistead G RussellSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0355, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-8870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Chemical Transport Models (CTMs) such as the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) have been used in linking observations of trace gases to emissions and developing vertical column distributions, there remain consistent biases between CTM simulations and satellite retrievals. Simulated tropospheric NO

Indexed as

chemical transport modelsNO2 vertical column densitiesNOx ratiopower plantssatellite retrievalsTROPOMI

Identifiers

PMID40534900
PMCPMC12172011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.