ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025
Discovery of Novel Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Peptides Using a Machine Learning and Molecular Docking Approach.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Pyrazole-Based Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Medicinal Chemistry Perspectives from 2020 to 2025.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Aided Drug Repurposing for Screening COX-2 Inhibitors from Traditional Chinese Medicines.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Peptide-Based Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease: Medicinal Chemistry, AI-Guided Computational Design, and Blood-Brain Barrier Delivery.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Machine learning-assisted network pharmacology reveals that the Chaihu-Longgu-Muli decoction modulates the inflammatory microenvironment to treat perimenopausal syndrome.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Alzheimer's disease poses a significant threat to human health. Currenttherapeutic medicines, while alleviate symptoms, fail to reverse the disease progression or reduce its harmful effects, and exhibit toxicity and side effects such as gastrointestinal discomfort and cardiovascular disorders. The major challenge in developing machine learning models for anti-acetylcholinesterase peptides discovery is the limited availability of active peptide data in public databases. This study primarily aims to address this challenge and secondarily to discover novel, safer, and less toxic anti-acetylcholinesterase peptides for better Alzheimer's disease treatment. Methods: A Random Forest Classifier model was constructed from a hybrid dataset of non-peptide small molecules and peptides. It was applied to screen a custom peptide library. The binding affinities of the predicted peptides to acetylcholinesterase were assessed via molecular docking, and top ranked peptides were selected for experimental assay. Results: The top six peptides (IFLSMC, WCWIYN, WIGCWD, LHTMELL, WHLCVLF, and VWIIGFEHM) were selected for experimental validation. Their inhibitiory effects on acetylcholinesterase were determined to be 0.007, 3.4, 1.9, 10.6, 1.5, and 3.9 μmol/L, respectively. Discussion: Predicting anti-acetylcholinesterase peptides is challenging due to the absence of a comprehensive, publicly accessible peptide database. Traditional approaches using only non-peptide small molecules for model construction often have poor performance on predicting active peptides. Here, we developed a machine-learning model from a hybrid dataset of non-peptide small molecules and peptides, which find six potent peptides. This model was as/superior accuracy compared to small-molecule-only models reported before, but has a significant higher capability of discriminating active peptides. Our work shows that hybrid datasets can boost machine-learning model prediction in peptide drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.