ArticleDigital health
A machine learning model for predicting severity-adjusted in-hospital mortality in pneumonia patients.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop a customized severity adjustment tool for hospital deaths in pneumonia patients considering characteristics of Korean discharged patients using representative data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency's Korea National Hospital Discharge In-Depth Injury Survey (KNHDIS). Methods: We analyzed 46,286 cases of pneumonia hospitalization among KNHDIS data from 2013 to 2022 and developed a model after adjusting for the severity of comorbidities using SAS and Python programs. Results: Analysis results showed that among three complication adjustment tools, including the existing complication index K-CCI (Korean-Charlson Comorbidity Index) and newly developed m-K-CCI (modified-Korean-Charlson Comorbidity Index) and m-K-CCS (modified-Korean-Clinical Classification Software), m-K-CCS was the best. For model development and evaluation, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), logistic regression, classification and regression tree (CART), random forests, gradient-boosted model (GBM), and artificial neural network (ANN) analyses were performed. Analysis of the validation dataset showed that GBM's m-K-CCS had the highest AUC value of 0.910. Conclusion: These results suggest that further research is needed on models that adjust for the severity of comorbidities for each diagnosis to more accurately predict health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.