ArticleDigital health
Improving Hepatitis B outcome prediction with ensemble machine learning: A study on predictive models and interpretability.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress on the Application of Radiomics and Deep Learning in Liver Fibrosis.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Preventive strategies for chronic liver disease: A critical review of awareness, vaccine and screening programmes.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a significant global health threat, responsible for severe liver diseases such as liver failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The burden is especially high in low-income regions, where early diagnosis and treatment are critical for mitigating its impact. This study investigates the effectiveness of various machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting patient outcomes in HBV infection. Methods: The Chi-squared test was used for feature selection to find the most important factors, which were later applied to train and evaluate various ML models. To address the class imbalance in the dataset, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was used to balance the data. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used to improve the models' interpretability. Results: Among individual models, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression (LR) each achieved an accuracy of 92.5%. By implementing a Voting Classifier that combined SVM and LR, the overall accuracy was improved to 95%. The results showed that higher levels of some risk factors, especially in older patients, greatly raise the risk of death. Conclusion: These insights provide healthcare professionals and policymakers with valuable information to develop predicting better patient outcomes in HBV infection and patient care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.