ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Pro-dermcidin and derivatives as potential therapeutics for lethal experimental sepsis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pro-Dermcidin as an Emerging Regulator of Innate Immunity in Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A 110-amino acid precursor of dermcidin (pre-dermcidin, pre-DCD) with a 19-residue N-terminal leader signal sequence can be secreted by human eccrine sweat glands as a leader-less pro-domain-containing peptide (pro-DCD), which is enzymatically cleaved to generate C-terminal anti-microbial peptides (dermcidin-1, DCD-1) capable of killing various bacteria. Previously, it was unknown whether pro-DCD could be pharmacologically developed as potential therapeutics for lethal sepsis. Here, we demonstrated that pharmacological suppression of pro-DCD with polyclonal antibodies worsened sepsis-induced inflammation and liver injury, whereas supplementation of pro-DCD or its PEGylation derivatives significantly protected against sepsis, even when given 2-24 h after disease onset. These protective effects were associated with a significant reduction in circulating levels of surrogate biomarkers [e.g., Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), keratinocytes-derived chemokine (KC), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 (MCP-1), Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-2 (MIP-2), and Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor I (sTNFRI)], tissue injury, and blood bacterial counts. Although pro-DCD or its PEGylation derivatives failed to directly kill bacteria across a wide range of concentrations, they were able to activate microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3), a marker of autophagy and phagosome maturation in LC3-associated bacterial phagocytosis. Our findings suggest that pro-DCD-derived agents hold promise as potential therapies for clinical sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.