SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
Clinical and electrophysiological features of adult patients with combined central and peripheral demyelination- a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- B-Cell Depletion as Evidence for Shared Neuroimmune Pathways in Combined Central and Peripheral Demyelination: A Case Report and Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The classification of combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) is challenging due to unclear pathomechanisms and a lack of diagnostic and therapeutic criteria. Existing clinical data are limited to case reports or small series, with few attempts to define CCPD using radiological or molecular markers. Differential diagnosis depends on excluding well-characterized demyelinating diseases of the central and peripheral nervous systems. No systematic review has yet summarized the clinical, radiological, electrophysiological, molecular, and therapeutic evidence for CCPD. Methods: This review follows PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, uses the JBI critical appraisal tool for case series and is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42025640575). A systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies available up to December 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on adult patients with electrophysiological and imaging findings. Exclusion criteria included CCPD associated with infections, rheumatological conditions, or anti-MOG/anti-AQP4 antibodies. Results: Most patients exhibited hemiparesis assessed by MMT and MRC scales, with tetraparesis often asymmetrical. Imaging revealed either diffuse CNS involvement (cerebral hemispheres, brainstem, spinal cord) or lesions limited to one or two sites. Nerve conduction studies showed primarily demyelinating features. Treatment frequently involved combination therapies. Conclusions: This review underscores the dearth of high-quality data on CCPD, with extant studies frequently exhibiting a paucity of methodology for definitive analysis. The presence of elevated protein concentrations in CSF and the presence of antibodies, specifically anti-LacCer and anti-NF, has been identified as potential biomarkers of the disease. Furthermore, GCS in high doses might be one of the most effective treatment options. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025640575, identifier CRD42025640575.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.