Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Religious factors predict support for genomic medicine more strongly than politics, education, or trust: A survey of 4,939 adults in the United States.

James M DuBois, Eu Gene Chin, Erin D Solomon, Jenine K Harris, Peter Hill, Kari Baldwin, Lauren L Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James M DuBoisDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Eu Gene ChinRosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
Erin D SolomonDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jenine K HarrisBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Peter HillRosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
Kari BaldwinDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Lauren L BakerDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Religious affiliation and attendance at services is associated with lower levels of support for some genomic activities, such as genetic testing. However, little is known about why or how religion shapes attitudes toward genomics. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 4,939 participants representative of nine religious groups in the US (including atheist and agnostic). The survey examined (a) attitudes toward diverse activities associated with genomic medicine, (b) religious beliefs and practices, (c) control variables including trust in the healthcare system and knowledge of genetics, and (d) demographics. We examined differences between groups using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), and developed a regression model to identify significant predictors of support for genetic medicine. Results: When controlling for demographic variables, only small attitudinal differences existed between religious groups, though substantial variability existed within groups. Only seven variables uniquely predicted attitudes toward genomic medicine: acceptance of evolution, support for promoting community health within their spiritual community, knowledge of genetics, more permissive attitudes toward reproduction and end of life care within their spiritual community, distrust in the healthcare system, political orientation, and frequency of volunteering (in descending order). Discussion: Our findings suggest that stereotyping based on religious affiliation is seriously misguided, and engagement with religious groups on genomic medicine must go beyond education and address moral issues and worldviews.

Indexed as

ELSIethicsgenomicsreligion & public lifesurvey research

Identifiers

PMID40534838
PMCPMC12174436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.