Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534836›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Phase 1 clinical trial on Orgasmic Meditation (OM): Assessing safety and feasibility as a meditation practice for individuals with PTSD.

Daniel Kriegman, Rachel Pelletier, Caroline Griggs, Caryn Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel KriegmanInstitute of OM Foundation, Santa Rosa, CA, 95404, USA.
Rachel PelletierInstitute of OM Foundation, Santa Rosa, CA, 95404, USA.
Caroline GriggsInstitute of OM Foundation, Santa Rosa, CA, 95404, USA.
Caryn RothInstitute of OM Foundation, Santa Rosa, CA, 95404, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We measured the safety and efficacy of a treatment protocol that includes Orgasmic Meditation (OM), a structured attention training practice conducted between two people who follow a predefined set of detailed instructions. The practice involves one person gently stroking the clitoris of the other person for 15 minutes while both place their attention on the point of contact and notice what they feel. Practitioners of OM have reported that this practice is distinct both from typical sexual engagement and other forms of meditation (Siegel et al., 2022). Methods: Approved by Advarra Pro00061665. The study involved 28 participants (14 pairs), who were recruited based on residence in the Massachusetts area, being in a relationship, and having no history of practicing OM. Twenty-three of these participants identified and scored as having PTSD symptoms (PCL-5 scores >31). Participants were instructed to perform the OM practice a minimum of 12 times over a 4-week period and met weekly with the principal investigator to determine if any safety issues were manifesting. A series of surveys (Daily: Tumescence Survey and OM journal. Baseline and weekly: PCL-5. Baseline, completion and follow up: Eudaimonia assessment, PHQ-9, Gad-7, BIPF, and OM perception survey at) were administered to measure the results. Results: Orgasmic Meditation showed positive results in persons with PTSD. Orgasmic meditation is safe and may offer improvement in symptoms. OM showed 47 % improvement in PTSD scores Average score decreased from 60 to 28. Average score across 23 participants rate 4.9/5 that OM is safe. Conclusion: These results suggest that Orgasmic Meditation may be safe for this traumatized population, and may ameliorate symptoms of PTSD. Further research appears to be warranted to determine the efficacy of OM in treatment of PTSD.

Identifiers

PMID40534836
PMCPMC12175237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.