Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534834›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2025

A french real-world experience with cenobamate in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: A retrospective observational study.

Antoine Plaquevent, Floriane Le Goff, Nathalie Chastan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antoine PlaqueventNeurophysiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, 1 Rue de Germont, 76031 ROUEN, France.
Floriane Le GoffNeurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, 1 Rue de Germont, 76031 ROUEN, France.
Nathalie ChastanNeurophysiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, 1 Rue de Germont, 76031 ROUEN, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common and disabling neurological disorder. To significantly improve the quality of life of patients, the primary goal is to achieve seizure freedom. Unfortunately, 30 % of epilepsies are drug-resistant and seizure freedom is not acheived. Cenobamate is a new anti-seizure medication (ASM) used as a treatment for focal epilepsy in adults whose seizures have not been able to be controlled by two prior ASM. Two previous pivotal studies have showed an unusual seizure-free rate at 21 % and 28 %. A retrospective observational study was conducted to determine the effectiveness, safety and retention of cenobamate in 87 patients with highly focal drug-resistant epilepsy. The responder rate was 48 % with a seizure-free rate of 18 % at the last follow-up, with a mean dose of cenobamate at 216 mg. Adverse events were reported in 74 % patients, the most frequent being somnolence/fatigue and dizziness. No cases of DRESS or death were reported during the study. Cenobamate was discontinued in 34 % of patients, for a lack of efficacy despite an adequate dosage (≥ 200 mg) in 30 %, a poor tolerance in 27 %, for both insufficient efficacy and poor tolerance in 40 %, or for pregnancy plans in 3 %. Cenobamate is an effective and well-tolerated ASM in drug-resistant focal epilepsy and should be tried for highly drug-resistant epilepsy, even if many previous ASM have failed. Moreover, the impressive seizure-free rate leads to introducing cenobamate to all patients before or during the evaluation for surgical candidacy, and in any case before any resective surgery.

Indexed as

CenobamateDrug-resistant focal epilepsyObservational study

Identifiers

PMID40534834
PMCPMC12175729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.