ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2025
Performance verification of the new UF-1500 urine particle analyser: a new opportunity for small and medium laboratories.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The urine examination: a modern technological test with a very ancient history.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2026Review
- Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of the UF-5000 Parameter Atyp.C in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The UF-1500 is the new fully automated urine particle analyser by Sysmex specifically tailored for small and medium laboratories. This study aim to validate its analytical and diagnostic performance. Methods: 754 first morning mid-stream urines were analysed on UF-1500; 550 samples were used for the UF-5000 comparison and 204 were used for the correlation with manual count on Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber. Carry-over, linearity and imprecision of the UF-1500 were also assessed. Results: Correlation with the UF-5000 was excellent, with Conclusion: The analytical and diagnostic performance is satisfactory for almost all the parameters, when compared with the UF-5000; the correlation with the reference method is equally good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.