ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Quantitative Analysis of Penetrating Wound Behavior Under Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through the ages, the methods of wound dressing have been changing to obtain the best therapeutic effect. The driving force of the process is the development of knowledge and tools. One of the state-of-the-art methods is negative pressure wound therapy. The article presents the results of experimental studies on wound models made in ballistic gel casts and dressed with a vacuum dressing. Methods: The experiments were performed on samples made of ballistic gel. In the casts, holes were cut out to simulate a wound. Wounds were closed with a dressing connected to a pump, creating a negative pressure. Every model was photographed in two perpendicular sections before and after applying the negative pressure. The changes in shape and size were compared. The numerical model of the wound was also created to confirm experimental observation. Results: A comparison of wound geometry before and after applying negative pressure reveals a reduction in size in every case. The volume of the wound was reduced by 40%, while its surface area decreased by 27%. This reduction effect was independent of wound size. Furthermore, numerical computations indicate that veins terminating in wounds also reduce in size, with their shape becoming flattened. Conclusion: The results of experiments and numerical analyses reveal that vacuum dressing can effectively reduce the surface area of the wound by shrinking it and decreasing blood vessel outlets, positively influencing the bleeding reduction. An additional effect is compressive stress in the circumferential direction of the wound, which prevents further development of the wound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.