ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Modeling endochondral ossification: Effects of mechanical loading and bone shape.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brachydactyly Type A1 Caused by anReports (MDPI) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The influence of mechanical and biochemical factors has been extensively studied through the development of mathematical, computational and experimental research, offering insights into bone development and the complex interplay of contributing factors. This knowledge has potential applications in multiple areas of medical science. However, existing models lack flexibility in simulating diverse geometric and loading conditions. This study proposes the development of a model to address these limitations. Methods: A computational approach employing parametric geometry and loading conditions was applied, accounting for the effects of stress on epiphyseal growth. Finite element analyses were conducted iteratively to predict potential sites of secondary ossification based on stress distribution. Three distinct scenarios with varying geometry and loading conditions were evaluated, revealing differences in the presence, number, and spatial distribution of secondary ossification centers (SOCs). Findings: The variation in the onset of SOCs across different configurations and parameter adjustments was analyzed. The model predicts a shift in SOC location influenced by cartilage concavity and width; the formation of two ossification centers in concave heads subjected to dual loading; reduced surface ossification contributing to articular cartilage; and a decrease in the ossification index (OI) with increased volume. Conclusions: The model emulates the formation of anatomically distinct human joints, though some certain outputs based on non-biological geometries were excluded. Moreover, the model focuses solely on mechanical and geometrical influences, while other aspects of mechanobiology should be incorporated in future work. Nevertheless, the model effectively captures the formation of various human joints and provides a foundation for future studies and diverse applications in medical research, particularly in bone growth disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.