ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Osteopathic Graduates in Plastic Surgery: How Can We Improve the Pipeline?
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Plastic Surgery Match Trends After Step 1 Pass/Fail Implementation: Data Analysis and Literature Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Nationwide Analysis of Pipelining and Medical School Affiliation in the US Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrated plastic surgery residency is one of the most competitive specialties for medical students to match into. This study was performed to identify trends in osteopathic applicants to plastic surgery and current osteopathic trainees within the field. Furthermore, we explore osteopathic students' perception of plastic surgery and identify methods that our national societies can utilize to foster exposure to the field. Methods: All integrated and independent plastic surgery training programs were identified from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Trainees' medical education was obtained via program websites and public profiles. An anonymous survey was distributed to Student Affairs directors of all 43 osteopathic medical schools, who were asked to forward the survey to their respective student bodies. The survey consisted of 35 questions, inquiring about exposure and barriers to surgical education opportunities, and overall perception of plastic surgery. Results: A total of 1245 plastic surgery trainees were included in analysis. Within integrated programs, osteopathic graduates account for 1.2% of current postgraduate year 1-5 residents. Our survey gauging osteopathic students' perception of plastic surgery received 252 responses from 7 osteopathic schools; 87.4% of students believed that exposure is lacking at their institution and 92.6% of students interested in subinternships experienced barriers arranging these experiences. Conclusions: Osteopathic graduates represent a minority of plastic surgery trainees, which may be attributed to barriers encountered by osteopathic students when seeking exposure to plastic surgery during their undergraduate medical education. Early exposure and increased opportunities for mentorship and away rotations may encourage more osteopathic students to pursue plastic surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.