Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534645›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

The Themes Have to Be Considered in the Change Process Within Healthcare Organizations: Critical Analysis Review.

Hatem H Alsaqqa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hatem H AlsaqqaAl-Quds University, Deanship of Scientific Research, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0002-7440-1005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is intended to scrutinize different articles' types and determine a suitable process, model or framework for successful change in healthcare organizations. An integrative review of the literature was conducted. The search strategy began with three electronic databases (EBSCOhost, Google Scholar and PubMed). Considering the inclusion criteria, published articles that examined the change process within the healthcare organizations in the timeframe between 2000 and 2023 were chosen. Results extraction and analysis were completed on all the included articles. The final sample for this review comprised 19 studies. Based on common meanings and vital issues, 8 main themes contributing to change in healthcare organizations were integrated and grouped into four main categories (process dimensions), two adjunct factors (strategic dimensions) and one mediating tool and a result category. The four main categories are readiness to change, team-building, tangible and intangible variables' characteristics and the two adjunct factors are the metaphor design and time perspective. In addition to technology as a mediating role for change and the scale of the change as a resulted outcome. In general, collections that emerged in this study could be useful for framing initiatives to arouse organizational change in healthcare. However, little is known about the relative significance of each acknowledged factor within the change process in healthcare organizations. Various methodological research is recommended for narrowing this gap. Before beginning the change process, ongoing studies should focus on the psychological features of organizational scales for healthcare contexts.

Indexed as

changecritical analysis reviewhealthcareorganizationtheme

Identifiers

PMID40534645
PMCPMC12176066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.