Observational studyStroke2025
Prediction Model to Optimize Long-Term Antithrombotic Therapy Using Covert Vascular Brain Injury and Clinical Features.
Observational study in Stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02889653 (The Bleeding With Antithrombotic Therapy Study 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Bleeding With Antithrombotic Therapy Study 2
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural History and Factors Influencing 90-Day Clinical Outcomes and 1-Year Recurrence of Thalamic Stroke.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Balancing Embolic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Estimating Stroke Risk in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Left Atrial Stiffness: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDefining the risk of developing major bleeding, especially intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or ischemic stroke (IS) in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy is crucial. Existing risk prediction tools would inadequately assess the net clinical benefit of antithrombotic therapy. We aimed to develop novel risk scores incorporating covert vascular brain injury to personalize the risk assessment of major bleeding, ICH, and IS in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.
methodsThe prospective, multicenter, observational study (BAT2 [Bleeding With Antithrombotic Therapy Study-2]) enrolled patients receiving oral antiplatelets or anticoagulants from 52 hospitals across Japan between 2016 and 2019. Multimodal brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline under prespecified conditions to determine cerebral small vessel disease (white matter hyperintensity, cerebral microbleed, lacune, enlarged perivascular space, and cortical superficial siderosis), nonlacunar infarct, and intracranial artery disease with central reading. Risk scores, collectively termed the BAT2 scores, were developed separately to evaluate the comparative risks of (1) major bleeding, (2) ICH, and (3) IS based on covariates from Cox proportional hazards models and clinical relevance. Model performance was assessed with the Harrell C-index and calibration slope adjusted for optimism via bootstrapping.
resultsOf 5378 patients enrolled, 5250 were analyzed (mean age, 71±11 years, 33% women); 93 experienced major bleeding, including 55 had ICH, and 197 had IS during a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Predictors for bleeding included age, underweight, renal impairment, hypertension, cerebral microbleed, lacune, and antithrombotic treatment type. Predictors for ICH further included deep white matter hyperintensity but not renal impairment. For IS, predictors included age, renal impairment, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, lacune, cerebral microbleed, nonlacunar infarct, and intracranial artery disease. Prediction performance showed optimism-adjusted C-index and calibration slope of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.74) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.62-1.06) for bleeding, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.80) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.56-1.02) for ICH, and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.68) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.73-1.18) for IS.
conclusionsThe BAT2 scores may help optimize the balance between risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02889653. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; Unique identifier: UMIN000023669.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.