ReviewJournal of minimally invasive surgery2025
Research trends in virtual reality surgical simulation for education: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of VR technology in standardized residency training for endoscopic procedures in otorhinolaryngology.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a transformative tool in surgical education, offering a controlled and repeatable training environment that mitigates ethical and legal challenges associated with traditional apprenticeship models. By simulating real-life surgical scenarios, VR allows trainees to practice procedures safely while improving skill acquisition and procedural efficiency. In this study, we systematically reviewed research trends in VR-based surgical education to provide insights into its current applications and future potential. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, identifying 395 studies. Of these, 92 studies met predefined inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The selected studies were analyzed based on publication period, surgical procedure, medical specialty, country of origin, and outcome measures. Results: Study findings revealed that research on VR surgical simulation peaked between 2005 and 2009, followed by a decline in recent years. Laparoscopic and endoscopic training were the most frequently studied procedures, with general surgery and gastroenterology being the most predominant specialties. The United States contributed the highest number of publications. Common outcome measures for evaluating VR training effectiveness included time, movement economy, subject evaluation, error rates, proficiency scales, and accuracy. Conclusion: These findings illustrate the historical trajectory and current landscape of VR use in surgical training. While the initial surge in interest has waned, VR remains a valuable tool for procedural skill development, particularly in laparoscopic and endoscopic training, and its future potential may depend on improvements in realism, cost-efficiency, and curriculum integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.