Evidence map›Paper›PMID 4053445›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis

Absence of a relationship of size of primary colon carcinoma with metastasis and survival.

W Miller, D Ota, G Giacco, V Guinee, T Irimura, G Nicolson, K Cleary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The invasive edge: invasion in colorectal cancer.Clinical & experimental metastasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Miller
D Ota
G Giacco
V Guinee
T Irimura
G Nicolson
K Cleary
Anderson Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study analysed the relationship of tumor size to regional and systemic metastasis and to survival according to stage of disease. Colon cancers (391 cases) that were treated surgically at M. D. Anderson Hospital from 1955 to 1975 were reviewed. Staging of disease was based on the Astler-Coller modification of Dukes' staging classification. The mean diameters (cm +/- s.e.m.) of Dukes' B1, B2, C2 and D tumors were 4.47 +/- 0.34 (n = 46), 6.61 +/- 0.29 (n = 147), 5.39 +/- 0.23 (n = 71) and 5.78 +/- 0.24 (n = 120), respectively. The mean diameter of Dukes' B2 tumors was significantly greater than C2 (P less than 0.001) and D (P less than 0.05) tumors. Within stage B and C, size of the primary tumor showed no relationship to five year adjusted survival. Our findings suggest that colon carcinoma metastasis and survival are independent of tumor size. Because tumor burden does not account for distant disease, specific tumor cell phenotypes and biological processes are probably more important in determining metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID4053445
OpenAlexW2069415868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.