Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534325›Full record

Trial reportMolecular nutrition & food research2025

Postprandial Responses to Meals Enriched With Canola or Coconut Oil in Men and Women With a Risk Phenotype for Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Hannah F Kienēs, Christina Diekmann, Tim Schiemann, Carolin Wiechmann, Christina Kopp, Birgit Stoffel-Wagner, Martin Coenen, Robert Németh, Sarah Egert

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hannah F KienēsInstitute of Nutritional and Food Science, Nutritional Physiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christina DiekmannInstitute of Nutritional and Food Science, Nutritional Physiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tim SchiemannInstitute of Nutritional and Food Science, Nutritional Physiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Carolin WiechmannInstitute of Nutritional and Food Science, Nutritional Physiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christina KoppInstitute of Nutritional and Food Science, Nutritional Physiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Birgit Stoffel-WagnerInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin CoenenInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Robert NémethInstitute of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sarah EgertInstitute of Nutritional and Food Science, Nutritional Physiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4092-8981

Funding

Union for the Promotion of Oil and Protein Crops e. V. (UFOP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the metabolic response to meals with canola or coconut oil (rich in unsaturated vs. rich in saturated fatty acids [FAs]). Although the longer-term metabolic effects of these fats are well evidenced, their postprandial effects remain inconclusive. In this randomized crossover trial, 29 participants with increased cardiometabolic risk consumed four isoenergetic meals containing 25 or 50 g (low-fat meals [LFMs], high-fat meals [HFMs]) of canola or coconut oil. Blood samples for analysis of triglycerides (TGs), glucose, insulin, nonesterified FAs (NEFAs), IL-6, and individual FAs were collected in the fasting state and 6 h postprandially (every 0.5-1 h). The incremental areas under the curves (iAUCs) of TGs and IL-6 were higher after canola than after coconut oil. Concentrations of lauric and myristic acid were higher after coconut oil, while concentrations of oleic, linoleic, and α-linolenic acid were higher after canola oil. The TG iAUC was higher after HFMs than after corresponding LFMs. NEFAs decreased more after LFMs than after HFMs. The glucose and insulin iAUCs were higher after LFMs than after HFMs. Canola and coconut oil induced different metabolic responses. The manner and strength of the postprandial effects differed depending on the parameter.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoconut OilPostprandial PeriodRapeseed OilAdultBlood GlucoseCardiometabolic Risk FactorsCross-Over StudiesFatty AcidsFatty Acids, NonesterifiedFemaleHumansInsulinInterleukin-6MaleMealsBlood GlucoseCoconut OilFatty AcidsFatty Acids, NonesterifiedInsulinInterleukin-6Rapeseed OilTriglyceridesarterial stiffnesscanola oilcardiometabolic riskcoconut oiltriglyceride response

Identifiers

PMID40534325
PMCPMC12490190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.