ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025
Generative priors for MRI reconstruction trained from magnitude-only images using phase augmentation.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noise-Level Adaptive Diffusion Priors for Zero-Shot Low-Field MRI Quality Enhancement.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Generative priors for MRI reconstruction trained from magnitude-only images using phase augmentation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
- Leveraging Physics-Based Synthetic MR Images and Deep Transfer Learning for Artifact Reduction in Echo-Planar Imaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Deep learning for accelerated and robust MRI reconstruction.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Training deep learning based dynamic MR image reconstruction using open-source natural videos.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we present a workflow to construct generic and robust generative image priors from magnitude-only images. The priors can then be used for regularization in reconstruction to improve image quality. The workflow begins with the preparation of training datasets from magnitude-only magnetic resonance (MR) images. This dataset is then augmented with phase information and used to train generative priors of complex images. Finally, trained priors are evaluated using both linear and nonlinear reconstruction for compressed sensing parallel imaging with various undersampling schemes. The results of our experiments demonstrate that priors trained on complex images outperform priors trained only on magnitude images. In addition, a prior trained on a larger dataset exhibits higher robustness. Finally, we show that the generative priors are superior to [Formula: see text]-wavelet regularization for compressed sensing parallel imaging with high undersampling. These findings stress the importance of incorporating phase information and leveraging large datasets to raise the performance and reliability of the generative priors for MR imaging (MRI) reconstruction. Phase augmentation makes it possible to use existing image databases for training.This article is part of the theme issue 'Generative modelling meets Bayesian inference: a new paradigm for inverse problems'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.