Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534292›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025

Generative priors for MRI reconstruction trained from magnitude-only images using phase augmentation.

Guanxiong Luo, Xiaoqing Wang, Moritz Blumenthal, Martin Schilling, Raviteja Kotikalapudi, Erik Rauf, Niels Focke, Martin Uecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Generative priors for MRI reconstruction trained from magnitude-only images using phase augmentation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guanxiong LuoUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8005-4639
Xiaoqing WangAthinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Moritz BlumenthalInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Martin SchillingInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Raviteja KotikalapudiClinic for Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Erik RaufClinic for Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Niels FockeClinic for Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Martin UeckerInstitute of Biomedical Imaging, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Steiermark, Austria.

Funding

Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we present a workflow to construct generic and robust generative image priors from magnitude-only images. The priors can then be used for regularization in reconstruction to improve image quality. The workflow begins with the preparation of training datasets from magnitude-only magnetic resonance (MR) images. This dataset is then augmented with phase information and used to train generative priors of complex images. Finally, trained priors are evaluated using both linear and nonlinear reconstruction for compressed sensing parallel imaging with various undersampling schemes. The results of our experiments demonstrate that priors trained on complex images outperform priors trained only on magnitude images. In addition, a prior trained on a larger dataset exhibits higher robustness. Finally, we show that the generative priors are superior to [Formula: see text]-wavelet regularization for compressed sensing parallel imaging with high undersampling. These findings stress the importance of incorporating phase information and leveraging large datasets to raise the performance and reliability of the generative priors for MR imaging (MRI) reconstruction. Phase augmentation makes it possible to use existing image databases for training.This article is part of the theme issue 'Generative modelling meets Bayesian inference: a new paradigm for inverse problems'.

Indexed as

image priorsimage reconstructioninverse problemmagnetic resonance imagingparallel imagingregularization

Identifiers

PMID40534292
PMCPMC12177528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.