ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Poly(hydroxy-oxazolidone) Thermoplastic Elastomers for Safer, Greener and Customizable Blood-Contacting Medical Devices.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Poly(hydroxy-oxazolidone) Thermoplastic Elastomers for Safer, Greener and Customizable Blood-Contacting Medical Devices.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) of the polyurethane (PU)-type have broad applications in healthcare. However, these materials have a number of drawbacks. Their synthesis requires the use of toxic isocyanates. Their hemocompatibility remains insufficient, resulting in high rates of thrombotic complications of most common blood-contacting devices, which further increases the risk of infection. Here, we report the facile, up-scalable preparation of a greener non-isocyanate polyurethane (NIPU) TPE, poly(hydroxy-oxazolidone) (PHOx). We show that PHOx can be processed by multiple relevant manufacturing techniques, i.e., hot pressing, injection-molding, electrospinning, and additive manufacturing. In vitro hemocompatibility tests with human blood demonstrate better performance than a conventional medical grade PU. PHOx triggers less contact phase activation of coagulation, less plasma protein adsorption and less platelet adhesion than PU. The adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis is also reduced in the first 2 hours of contact as compared to PU. PHOx is neither hemolytic nor cytotoxic upon indirect or direct contact with endothelial cells or fibroblasts. Additionally, subcutaneous implantation of PHOx in rabbits for one and four weeks confirms in vivo biocompatibility and no material degradation. PHOx is therefore a highly valuable biomaterial and a potential isocyanate-free alternative to conventional PU-based TPEs for manufacturing customizable blood-contacting devices with improved hemocompatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.