ArticleJournal of neuroendocrinology2025
Clinical/pathological features and survival outcomes of extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas: A retrospective single-center series.
Article in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunological Features of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Adrenal Tumors.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical/pathological features and survival outcomes of extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas: A retrospective single-center series.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare malignancies with a dismal prognosis, few therapeutic options, and a lack of predictive factors. We describe a large series of extra-pulmonary (EP) NEC patients from a neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) referral center, aiming to improve the clinical management of these diseases. Medical records of patients with histological diagnosis of pure histology EP-NEC, discussed at the NEN-dedicated multidisciplinary team (MDT) between October 2018 and August 2022, were included. Demographic features, tumor characteristics, molecular profile, treatments, and responses to treatments were collected. Among 1594 NEN diagnoses discussed at the MDT during the study period, 377 were NECs; the final population consisted of 173 patients, mostly presenting with advanced disease and often with a gastroenteropancreatic tract primary tumor. Molecular profiling was available for 52 patients (30%). The most frequent alterations occurred in TP53 and KRAS. One of 25 patients tested for microsatellite instability was confirmed MSI-h; one of 52 patients tested had a high tumor mutational burden (TMB = 19). Median overall survival (OS) was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.2-18.5). Most patients with advanced disease received a first-line chemotherapy (136/153 [88.9%]), often platinum plus etoposide (111/136 patients [82%]). The overall response rate (ORR) to first-line was 40%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.4-6.4). Forty-two percent and 18% of patients received second- and third-line therapy, respectively. No significant difference was seen when stratifying OS and PFS by Ki-67 groups and tumor cell morphology, whereas performance status and presence of metastases were significantly related to OS. In this single-center retrospective large series of EP-NECs, almost half of the patients showed a tumor response to first-line chemotherapy. No relevant correlation was found with primary site, tumor cell morphology, or Ki-67. The proportion of patients receiving subsequent lines, along with the mOS, confirms the aggressiveness of this disease. Molecular profiling was performed only fragmentarily, with limited practical applicability. Efforts shall be made in the future to implement these investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.